<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So You Wanna Be a Writer, Pt. 2 (For the Critics, These Pearls . . .)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ndwilson.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=76" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loren Eaton</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Eaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>Read it, loved it, blogged it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it, loved it, blogged it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb Woodbridge</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb Woodbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>One writer I sometimes read, Paul Cornell, always gives this advice to aspiring writers: &quot;It is your duty to seek out informed criticism of your writing, and change your writing for the better because of it&quot;. Good advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One writer I sometimes read, Paul Cornell, always gives this advice to aspiring writers: &#8220;It is your duty to seek out informed criticism of your writing, and change your writing for the better because of it&#8221;. Good advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe and jen carlson</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>joe and jen carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Hi Nate!

Well, I&#039;m thinking ages 6-9ish...perhaps squeeze 10 in there too, depending.  I want them to be old enough to read a good, full story, but young enough to throw in some really fetching illustrations in a non-chaptered book.  And though I&#039;m not British, I&#039;d love it to have the wit and cheer of some of the stuff I grew up on and have since devoured as an adult.  And animals often enter my head, but not the cuddly kind.  And lastly, can one write a series for children on food?  Kind of like a sort of G.K. Chesterton &quot;trifle&quot;, pulling out the beauty and hilarity of a thing, but for children...and on food specifically.  I just finished a short on pie.

As you can see, I&#039;m still formulating. :)

It was Rhetoric.  I gave a speech while wearing white shoes and black pants.  You asked the class to note that my eloqution was successful both because of and despite my overruling common dress code.  The gist was that I got away with it in a rather whimsical manner, but to never do it again.  But yah, what WAS I thinking, anyway!?  Probably about Joe.  Ha! :)

Thank you, Nate!  Merry Advent to you and you fam!

Jen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nate!</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m thinking ages 6-9ish&#8230;perhaps squeeze 10 in there too, depending.  I want them to be old enough to read a good, full story, but young enough to throw in some really fetching illustrations in a non-chaptered book.  And though I&#8217;m not British, I&#8217;d love it to have the wit and cheer of some of the stuff I grew up on and have since devoured as an adult.  And animals often enter my head, but not the cuddly kind.  And lastly, can one write a series for children on food?  Kind of like a sort of G.K. Chesterton &#8220;trifle&#8221;, pulling out the beauty and hilarity of a thing, but for children&#8230;and on food specifically.  I just finished a short on pie.</p>
<p>As you can see, I&#8217;m still formulating. <img src='http://ndwilson.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It was Rhetoric.  I gave a speech while wearing white shoes and black pants.  You asked the class to note that my eloqution was successful both because of and despite my overruling common dress code.  The gist was that I got away with it in a rather whimsical manner, but to never do it again.  But yah, what WAS I thinking, anyway!?  Probably about Joe.  Ha! <img src='http://ndwilson.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thank you, Nate!  Merry Advent to you and you fam!</p>
<p>Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-551</guid>
		<description>J.P.

Roger to the first two, and also on number three depending on how joyful the futility is (which hinges on the definition of &#039;great&#039;). Your closing thoughts lead me to believe that the futility you pitch isn&#039;t joyful at all. 

I can tell you this, the &#039;great conversation&#039; (so-called) spans centuries and lifetimes. It is the published record of the masters. The people in that Manhattan studio frequently have nothing to do with that conversation whatsoever--they&#039;re too absorbed in the &#039;great most recent trendiness and it boy/girl&#039; to pay attention to those whose words have outlasted trend and will outlast them.

Last thought--writers today have an advantage over the masters (and plenty of educational disadvantages). We should be able to surpass Austen or Steinbeck or Lewis because we have the advantage of having them to look to and stand on. This is not to say that we will surpass them, but their backs are there for us to climb. Cheers (and thanks for posting).

NDW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.P.</p>
<p>Roger to the first two, and also on number three depending on how joyful the futility is (which hinges on the definition of &#8216;great&#8217;). Your closing thoughts lead me to believe that the futility you pitch isn&#8217;t joyful at all. </p>
<p>I can tell you this, the &#8216;great conversation&#8217; (so-called) spans centuries and lifetimes. It is the published record of the masters. The people in that Manhattan studio frequently have nothing to do with that conversation whatsoever&#8211;they&#8217;re too absorbed in the &#8216;great most recent trendiness and it boy/girl&#8217; to pay attention to those whose words have outlasted trend and will outlast them.</p>
<p>Last thought&#8211;writers today have an advantage over the masters (and plenty of educational disadvantages). We should be able to surpass Austen or Steinbeck or Lewis because we have the advantage of having them to look to and stand on. This is not to say that we will surpass them, but their backs are there for us to climb. Cheers (and thanks for posting).</p>
<p>NDW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Jen (and Joe):

Thanks for the comment. I&#039;m glad you&#039;re going for it. What age/market are you hoping to hit? (And I deny ever making any comment about your shoes when you were an undergrad--what I don&#039;t remember can&#039;t have happened, I&#039;m sure.)

Cheers.

NDW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen (and Joe):</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re going for it. What age/market are you hoping to hit? (And I deny ever making any comment about your shoes when you were an undergrad&#8211;what I don&#8217;t remember can&#8217;t have happened, I&#8217;m sure.)</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>NDW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.P.</title>
		<link>http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>J.P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ndwilson.com/blog/?p=76#comment-533</guid>
		<description>It is important to gain three things if &quot;you wanna be a writer&quot;: 1) a sense of quality of writing, 2) a sense of joy when you&#039;ve participated in the dance of quality writing, 3) a sense that you will never be a great writer.  Face it.  The great conversation is taking place in an upper west side 1500 sq. ft. Manhattan studio - standing room only.  You are not there and I am beginning to ponder whether the doors closed 2 hours ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is important to gain three things if &#8220;you wanna be a writer&#8221;: 1) a sense of quality of writing, 2) a sense of joy when you&#8217;ve participated in the dance of quality writing, 3) a sense that you will never be a great writer.  Face it.  The great conversation is taking place in an upper west side 1500 sq. ft. Manhattan studio &#8211; standing room only.  You are not there and I am beginning to ponder whether the doors closed 2 hours ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
